5 things a Fallout MMO must do

Rm_headshot
Thursday, January 19, 2012

After years of legal wrangling, developer Bethesda Softworks recently cleared the way to create a massively multiplayer online role-playing game based on Fallout. That’s the worst news my free time’s gotten in quite a while.

Fallout
But Chuck Norris? Chuck Norris never changes.

I’ve spent a disgusting amount of time roaming the wasteland. A Fallout game that never ends might as well step out of my computer, close out my remaining ties to the mortal world, and repossess my soul. I thought myself safe so long as Interplay -- a once-proud publisher driven into the ground by the same people who brought you Superman 64 -- blindly clung to their last empty plans for Fallout Online. But if you ever thought they moved a single inch past a few isolated concept drawings, I’d like to sell Australia to you. Trust me. It’s very affordable.

So nothing’s formally announced, but yeah...Bethesda just paid a cool $2 million for the Fallout MMO rights. They’re serious. And as a dedicated wasteland historian/opportunist, I’ve got a few suggestions on how to build a better apocalypse.

 

An all-new Armageddon

Not a complaint, but Bethesda's entries in the franchise draw heavily from the original games created by Black Isle Studios. Even Fallout: New Vegas cribs from Black Isle's cancelled Fallout 3 (a.k.a. Van Buren). No surprise there, given that team went on to found New Vegas developer Obsidian Entertainment.

It's time for something completely different. Move past Super Mutant hordes and megalomaniacal computers, and give us a new kind of big bad. Maybe set the thing right after the war that ended it all. Show us the irradiated swamps of Florida, a flooded Big Easier, a demolished New York City, or even a former-Soviet workers’ paradise to contrast against our ‘50s Americana wonderland.

Fallout
A boy and his dog.


Companionship

I'm hard-pressed to think of a recent Bethesda game that doesn't give you a wingman. I have an equally tough time recalling an MMO that does, and for good reasons...not the least of which includes balancing the carnage if you take your A.I. entourage onto a Player vs. Player server.

Too damn bad. A Fallout without faithful, semi-feral hound Dogmeat isn't Fallout. And if he's in, the full rouge's gallery of humans, semi-humans, and robots to partner with should go in as well. That's a tradition that stretches all the way back to the series' Wasteland origins, as intrinsic to the franchise DNA as your Pip Boy. I'd definitely send them home (to be re-recruited later) if you join a party to go a'raiding, but nobody should have to roam the wasteland alone.

Fallout
I know exactly what you're thinking. "Threesome."


Classes and clans

Few things match the thrill of a “New Location Discovered!” notice popping up unexpectedly. Now, what if other players populated it? And you could trade with them? Or invade their settlement, plasma guns a’blazing?

That can happen if players are allowed to roll as raider thugs, brutish Super Mutants, immortal (and skin-free) ghouls, monstrous Deathclaws, or regular ol’ human survivors...and if people who band together get a physical location in the wasteland other players can visit. Then allow clan raids on the PvP servers. Picture joining an army of giant, yellow mutants charges a rusty, human-held ocean liner to make it your own. Or defending your home from those cannibalistic hordes. Simply epic.

Fallout
This is why you should never try to sneeze with your eyes open.


Super weapons: no. Vehicles: yes.

Hey, I'm all for packing state-of-the-art bang bang, but we can't have 5 million wastelanders running around with alien ray-guns that vaporize targets in one hit. We can't slingshot mini-nukes into the middle of every town. We can’t kill Super Mutants with a high-velocity teddy bear (I totally did this for the entire last half of Fallout 3). Just leave my beloved Lincoln Repeater, so I can snipe giant radscorpions from six miles away.

Or let me splatter them in my atomic car. Fallout 2’s primary means of transportation didn’t win many popularity contests at the time, but Fallout maps are de facto huge. Now scale that up to an MMO world. We’re gonna need something to get around in, and all the potential epic mounts are horribly mutated murder-beasts. So give us some popular mechanics...and a bit of vehicular manslaughter. That’s some serious Mad Max action right there.

Fallout
We are rebuilding our culture around the teachings of the giant concrete penis.


Perks, S.P.E.C.I.A.L., and V.A.T.S.

In a lot of ways, Fallout arrives tailor-made for MMO treatment. Its role-playing elements -- the S.P.E.C.I.A.L. (Strength, Perception, Endurance, Charisma, Intelligence, Agility, Luck) stats system and special-ability Perks -- can pretty much carry over wholesale.

But V.A.T.S. (Vault-Tec Assisted Targeting System) has to go.

It's just not feasible to have everyone freeze-framing the game at different times and auto-killing three or four other players using V.A.T.S., particularly in PvP. Instead, try something like Red Dead Redemption's Dead Eye targeting, where time slows down (in single player) or even lets you "paint" targets for a fast-draw shootout. You might not be the hyper-accurate killer you used to be, but then, neither are the five other players zeroing in on you.

 
Problem? Report this post
RUS MCLAUGHLIN'S SPONSOR
Comments (6)
Default_picture
January 20, 2012

Given the hundreds of hours i've already tallied up in fallout 3 and new vegas, a fallout MMO seems like a no-brainer. But my biggest complaint with fallout 3 especially was how dull the landscape was. After 80 hours of browns, greys and dust, it's unbearable. I hope the MMO springs for some more colours. Because I would way rather spend hundreds of hours in a beautiful world like skyrim than a depressing brown universe like fallout.

Jamespic4
January 20, 2012

I think this buy-up was done to decrease the chances of brand dilution/confusion. Given Interplay's recent track record, the company was as likely to damage the brand as they were to expand upon it. I doubt very much that Bethesda liked the idea of *any* company having influence over their IP, let alone one that's been as spotty as Interplay has in recent years.

Strange to think that Interplay used to be such a beloved company (I include myself in that; they are, after all, the company that brought The Lost Vikings to market). Anyway, don't expect to see a Fallout MMO from Bethesda any time soon just because this happened. Two million dollars isn't that much money -- at least not when you're talking about locking down a profitable IP 100%.

Default_picture
January 20, 2012
I laughed at the "irradiated swamps of Florida" comment. Brought me right back to "fountain of dreams". Good times, good times. I love the idea of a player defended settlement; but the devs need to give a compelling reason to build and defend a settlement. Guild housing. I wanna be a Uranium prospector. Now get your filthy mutated deathclaw paws off of my caps, punk.
Default_picture
January 20, 2012

See, this article really makes me want this, but then I remember that it would be made by Bethesda. Just imagine it. an MMO with no bugtesting or quality control. The thing would be unplayable within a week for all the hackers that sign up,

Default_picture
January 21, 2012

Fallout MMO has been cancelled as of Jan 10th. Not saying Bethesda Soft wont make one some day but if they have held out making one for TES I dont see them caving in for Fallout no matter how cool it is.

Lolface
January 21, 2012

Fallen Earth kind of covered all of these bases. Doesn't mean it was good.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.