Porn -- It's in the game?

Default_picture
Saturday, February 13, 2010

Editor's note: I admit that I went looking for porn in video games when I was younger. To this day, I still find it interesting that video games are allowed to portray murder, which we're never supposed to commit, but not sex, which is something most of us do many times over the course of our lives. Gabriel provides a quick look in to the issue of sexually explicit material in video games below. -Jay

 


Leisure Suit Larry"Playboy doesn't cause sexual thoughts. Sexual thoughts exist and, therefore, there is Playboy. Do you see?" -Bill Hicks

Since the inception of the video game age, the temptation to somehow include pornography has constantly ridden shotgun. From the one-handed text-adventure Leather Goddesses of Phobos, to the life-replenishing hookers in Grand Theft Auto, game designers and companies have walked the line as carefully as possible to include overt sexuality without getting the dreaded scarlet "P" attached to their game. Their fears are valid. The X rating was actually invented to rate serious movies only intended for adults (The Oscar winning Midnight Cowboy was one of the first), but the porn industry's embrace of the rating turned it into such box-office poison that a new rating had to be established. The Adults Only rating from the ESRB carries much of the same stigma, keeping any game carrying it from the lucrative aisles of big box retailers such as Wal-Mart.

However, societal mores shift as time grinds inexorably on. Fundamentalist protesters from Judas Priest concerts in the '80s now hear "Breaking the Law" on classic rock radio. Profanity that would have previously resulted in massive fines from the FCC is repeated regularly on Cable television. As the first generation of gamers reaches middle age, will major publishers finally make the plunge and include pornographic content in games?

 

Unfairly or not, video games have an association with childhood and adolescence that is only now beginning to change. The average age of a gamer is 35, and yet any mention of sexual content in a game causes a media firestorm of biblical proportions. Perhaps the 10-year-old that chainsaws me online in Gears of War 2 might have something to do with this, but one could call that more a result of poor parenting than intended audience. We accept this rationale for movies and television, why not games?

Mass Effect

Regardless of other factors, money talks. Despite what Pat Robertson might tell you about the godless heathens on the coasts, it's not just them spending somewhere between $5-12 billion on pornography every year.

Millions of pornographic games exist, but they don't really go much further than simple undressing or questions that result in prerecorded video footage. Japan is the exception, with Hentai games that involve everything from puzzles to dating simulators. Yet, even in Japan, most of the games in the genre don't include much sex and the ones that do are censored to comply with Japanese decency laws. Even so, they are very popular; many titles sell over a million copies.
Money Puzzle

It's proven to be profitable, the societal stigma will continue to wane over time, and the generation that started with gaming will grow old enough to accept games that push the boundaries of content. So when, if ever, will we see a game developed by a major publisher with graphic sexual content? As much as I feel that the aversion to it will erode over coming years, I also feel that graphic content will continue to remain in the periphery.

Why? For the simple reason that it isn't necessary. If people want to watch pornography they certainly know where to find it. More importantly, it's not anything that adds much to the proceedings. Most people don't pay money to see a movie just to see the sex scenes in it. It is much the same in gaming. When the focus goes soft and the two bodies onscreen entwine, the purpose of that story arc is complete.  Anything more would be superfluous.

And for the record, absolutely no one wants to see "little Kratos."

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (15)
Waahhninja
January 27, 2010
As much as I'd like to see the morality warriors leave videogames alone and find somewhere else to complain I'm not so sure videogames will really NEED to start including more sexually explicit content. After all, it IS an interactive form of entertainment. Watching a movie with 20 seconds of slow-dissolve sex scenes is pretty normal; but you're not making them do it. Controlling a game and having a button for "thrust" and another for "bingo!" just seems unlikely. I know that's a terrible example. Oh well. Remember when people found out about Hot Coffee? Those scenes WERE interactive and it was deemed to be WAY too much for a game. I think as long as we stick to soft-fade camera pans we'll be ok.
Photo_on_2010-08-03_at_16
January 27, 2010
Sex scenes in games are, at the moment, terrible because of technological limitations. Polygonal characters can't even shake hands, let alone kiss or bump uglies without bizarre polygon clipping going on - or that strange "we're not quite touching" thing. That, or it's characters who keep their underwear on for nookie. I remember back at university some friends and I found an English translation of a hentai game called True Love. We were all addicted to it, and not because of the sex pictures in it. Rather, we were interested by the story and the well-written characters, each of whom had their own interesting tale to tell. The sex scenes in that game were symbolic of each of the girls overcoming their own personal challenges, and sharing that moment with the protagonist. (They were also made entirely of still images, so didn't have that awkward polygon-sex thing going on.) The sex scenes didn't feel gratuitous in True Love, because they were relatively infrequent and they made sense in the context of the story. The trouble with sex in games at the moment is that often it feels gratuitous and unnecessary. That doesn't stop me pursuing the romance subplots - personally, I love romance subplots - but I can see how people would think they were dumb. Perhaps we need to see more of "the romance game" mentioned on one of the podcasts a while back - was it Pixel Revolt? I'd certainly play it. (And I'm aware of the irony of sex discussions with those saucy American Apparel ads on either side of the comment window. :D)
Default_picture
January 28, 2010
@Pete Frank Rizzo has your back http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=34768 That said, I feel that the technology does exist to display it properly, at least in cutscenes. And while Uncharted 2 still suffers from the Uncanny Valley, the bits where people kissed looked almost normal. But at the same time, I'm still not sure that I want it there. I've often felt that extended sex scenes in movies are kind of worthless. (Come on, as hot as Malin Ackerman is, who didn't giggle at the sex scene in Watchmen?) Graphic depictions of sex are somewhat in the same category for me, at least in non-pornographic media. Eddie Murphy did a fantastic bit years ago about how you had to infer about the quality of the sex people in old movies had from the actions they took in the scenes directly following: "Look at the way she's flipping that omelet, Cary Grant must have knocked it out." Not seeing it was sexier than graphic depictions of it.
Default_picture
January 28, 2010
Whoops, dead link. Unfortunately you'll have to read about it as NBC has pulled the clip. http://www.gorelets.com/uncanny/theory/30-rock-popularizes-the-uncanny-valley/
Default_picture
February 12, 2010
Just FYI, I think you mean Midnight Cowboy, not Urban Cowboy.
Default_picture
February 12, 2010
Nice catch man--just changed it. Can't understand how I mixed those up as I actually looked it up to check when it won the Oscar. :)
Default_picture
February 12, 2010
@Jay I think it has more todo with american attitudes to sex than anything else, which is why you never see any US developed hentai games.
168822_661970459126_39512859_36783521_2046969_n
February 14, 2010
Another thought on the topic- Maybe sex isn't depicted so much in games because it really doesn't add much, if anything to games. I understand the whole idea of games growing up and having more adult themes - I totally support it too, I just don't see pornography as anything more than juvenile. I've never seen a sex scene in a movie that I've thought the film couldn't do without or that improved the film. You don't get any dialogue other than some grunts to add to the story or make the scene really anything of value. It's just a time sink intended to make the guys (and girls I suppose) in the audience smile and nudge each other. Last note- If porn were to come to consoles, it'll either be on the Wii, or once Natal and Arc come out. A launch title for Natal perhaps?
Default_picture
February 14, 2010
@Jordan--Actually, that wasn't another thought on the topic--it was the last paragraph of my article: "If people want to watch pornography they certainly know where to find it. More importantly, it's not anything that adds much to the proceedings."
168822_661970459126_39512859_36783521_2046969_n
February 14, 2010
Woops, sorry about that. It seems that I forgot a bit of the article when I was reading the comments. Just goes to say that they're not lying when they say college kids only retain 50% of what they read!
Shoe_headshot_-_square
February 15, 2010
Very well-written piece!
Default_picture
February 16, 2010
@gabriel: America's Puritan roots, and a general cultural reflex to be different from the rest of the world, ingrained into the nation's DNA: that's a simplistic answer, but I think that's a likely place to start. People killed things back then, and each other, from turkeys to "Injuns" to duels and "glorious" wars. Yet nobody really wanted to talk about their hoohahs and their wompoms and their badonkadonks, at least not out in the open. Heck, if people did their killing in private I'm sure violence wouldn't be such an open media topic today. So, violence is out in the open, sex is stuck in some closet. It probably doesn't help that the country gets cultural remixes all the time, although the power of the internet and its connection to porn nowadays just might bust the scene wide open to a public that may have to either deal with it or avoid the 'net completely. As far as games are concerned though, I think the day we find a serious simulator which does a responsible job of teaching technique and form without objectifying the target gender avatar more than necessary, like an modern Kama Sutra, essentially becoming a complement to girl and guy talk about how to do this or that, and we don't end up with a good portion of the population pulling themselves out of the gene pool after getting their mitts on the simulator, that's the day American sexual culture leaps into the 21st century. Or it might mark the moment in American history that parallels the Roman Empire's hedonistic "debauchery" which might have been tied to its fall... I need a better example of a successful sexually unrestrained cultural empire. Or is sexual restraint somehow correlated with the rise of empire?
Default_picture
February 16, 2010
@Jonathan: Your comments about sexual restraint touch on some of the rationales that Stephenson's Neo-Victorians argue in The Diamond Age. I am terribly afraid of a realistic sex simulator, the last thing Americans need is another reason not to get off the couch. I can't imagine that it would ever be non-objective either. Pornography by and large is a service of an unfulfilled desire. Whether it be fetish, style, or sex with someone out of your league pornography tends to not just hew to the lowest common denominator-- it *is* the lowest common denominator. There are of course exceptions, but if those sold as well there would be a lot more of them out there.
Default_picture
February 16, 2010
@gabriel: Don't get me wrong, I doubt anything related to sex that isn't sex itself will ever be completely non-objectifying without also having some kind of serious spiritual component (which I doubt will fly any time soon, unless New Age or something similar hits big). I'm just saying that it might be possible to have sex simulator and sex-related products that might be regarded more clinical than perverse (which itself might harken back to Victorian "psychiatry" I suppose). That's all tangential to your topic though, so I'll not say more here. Nice you bring up Diamond Age, I started it but got sidetracked with some help from the language, so I didn't even know there was a sex simulator in there. Liked Snow Crash though, definitely, so I'll get around to Diamond Age eventually. Oh, by the way, I might actually be for a very good sex simulator, at least for its potential to slow population growth, at least in the rich countries that are likeliest to afford it. Not sure how that might play into any kind of decline though, but there are worse ways to kill civilization...
Default_picture
February 16, 2010
@Jonathan--No sex simulator in the Diamond Age--but there is a discussion regarding the return of Victorian moral codes which ties in with what you were saying about sexual restraint correlating with successful empires.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.