Home
This is PsychoLogiKal and I approved this message."
"This is a direct repudiation of the claims being made that Sony's webservers were out of date by as much as five years"
what version was it that everyone said was outdated that they were running, wait i know 2.2.11.
would you like to know when this build was released into the wild? Dec. 15th 2008 6:08 p.m. GMT+0
http://freshmeat.net/projects/apache/releases/290269
hardly the five years your report was saying. and you yourself admint to looking at the nMap logs so you know the version said 2.2.11 which even a coffe boy journalist could cross check that fact, yet you failed to do so. or was it deliberatly inflated number to make the truth as hard as it is to believe that sony could be that dumb, seem all that more askew from the real world?
for what to increase your rep? i think you have suceeded in lowering your credibility with your flip flop wish wash: paraphrasing "The servers are all up to date, wait not some of them aren't, wait no but they don't count?&quo"
"This article was only ever intended to demonstrate that Sony was up to date on the majority of the PSN servers"
REALLY, not from the title and lack of ANY acknowledment of ANY not being up to date is diliberate misleading of the public and warping the headlines of stories to increase your hit count."
"And there are many more than the board will let me paste in. These seem to duplicate the functionality of the out of date "rc" servers, so it's not like one server was current and everything else was boned. We have everything looking current and a subset of servers with this "rc" in their address that aren't. *****We can't draw any conclusions from that without knowing what the "rc" servers are for.*****"
so then WHY ohhhhh WHY did you draw the conclusion that as the title reads is;
"Detective work reveals PSN servers up to date"
when clearly not ALL of them are, that is a misleading title and you go on to state OVER and OVER that the version they are running is 2.2.17 which is the latest version but fail to mention even ONCE that there WERE servers found running 2.2.11 as the reports suggest."
You go on attacking Dr. Eugene Spafford's testimony due to these IRC logs that are "anonymous IRC chat logs of dubious origins have miraculously become the most trusted news source in the industry."
Yet they are not annoymous logs anymore now are they?
they have been posted to the world for all to see with names and timestamps.
Then i went on to tell you that those logs come from EFnet #PS3Dev channel in which anyone who knows anything about IRC servers knows that there are logs kept of everything said on every channel archived.....not hard to find......what would that accoumplish?
I dunno mabe some nicknames tied with timestamps to Domains reversed back to IP addresses = *Knock* *Knock* *Knock* *FBI Open Up*
yes i undertand about BNC servers for re-directs and all that but once you have a pot to begin your lead from, its not that hard to trace back through the hops.
Hmmmmm..............."
I've known about how this all went down since BEFORE sony even admitted it was hackers. and have had the proof to back it. showed the proof to a few of my cisco buddies and explained how the hack happened on the 23rd on APR to them.
So you reporting this and using trumped up sources was an attack on my integrity of which i have no need to prove to you anymore because anon has leaked everyting i said was true :)
Thank you much, now can i have my retraction statement since this blog was quoted as the source around the world for this BOGUS story."
rumors?"
Proof enough Yet?"
