I don't have a problem with Call of Duty, or with Call of Duty fans, but some of them seem to think that all FPS's should be like CoD (I call those people Cod-pieces)."
An example showing a lack of fact checking, too: A few weeks ago information came out about the Uncharted 3 Subway promotion. The site I found the information on cited and linked to another site, they cited another site, and that site linked to the original source... a post on the Naughty Dog forums from a person who claimed that he got the information in response to an e-mail he sent to Subway asking about it. It did turn out to be accurate, but the journalists who covered it all ran the story as if it was an official announcement when it was actually an unverifiable story from an effectively anonymous source.
To be fair, a lot of "real" journalists fall into the same traps, softball interviews and regurgitated press releases, but there is so much more room for in-depth analysis in video games. It would help the industry mature, too."
PS3 version."
I am only referring to online compononets of games, not offline stuff. Again, I have no problem with the secondary market and agree with you about that, but online services do incur a cost to the publisher that the secondary market increases without compensating them for. Sega should not have to right to the money if I were to sell my copy of Valkyria Chronicles (which I never ever will), but If I were to sell my copy of Medal of Honor, that secondary user playing online would be adding expense to EA, and I think EA has a right to get some of that money back."
