NATHAN MCCLAUD
COMMUNITY WRITER
Default_picture
Followers (0)
Following (0)
LOCATION
Omaha, NE
39 year-old gamer who owned and played just about every console game there ever was. And played a lot of PC games (like Miner 49'er) that most kids would be like, "WTF is that???"
TWITTER  -NONE-
FACEBOOK  -NONE-
LINKEDIN  -NONE-
XBL  -NONE-
PSN  -NONE-
WII   -NONE-
STEAM  -NONE-
NATHAN MCCLAUD'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
POST BY THIS AUTHOR (0)
COMMENTS BY THIS AUTHOR (4)
"I think they'll get the feeling of urgency in the game. Granted, I never felt truly helpless when playing XCOM back then - more like I had to reign in several events that had the potential to spiral out of control if I didn't stay calm and think straight. Things got out of hand fast once the invasion took off, so if you weren't somewhat ready, then maybe you were helpless.

This is Sid Meier's company. Fraxis is good at creating both simulations (Gettysburg and Civilization) and narratives that have doom looming on the horizon (Alpha Centauri is the best at demonstrating that). XCOM was both types of game - a simulation and a narrative of imminent doom from an alien invasion. I think they can do it, and I think they won't hold back the punches from the original game."

Tuesday, January 17, 2012
"I'm not disputing that you may have had a good time playing XCOM not knowing what you were doing, but my point was that XCOM was not made that way intentionally. They did give you a manual with detailed instructions. It did tell you how to play the game and gave you hints about how to start it. It was the equivilent of a tutorial in today's games.

XCOM: UFO Defense was made in 1993. I was in college then, and I played like a bunch of different PC games then. Nearly all of them had manuals, and required you to read the manuals before you played the game. Remember Elite? That game gave you a 200 page instruction manual and there was no way in the world you could play the game to its fullest without the manual. Same with Masters of Orion (made by Microprose, the original developers of XCOM) - you had to read the manual. Microprose/Atari intended the player to read the manual for XCOM. And most of us did.

The reason we had such huge manuals and very few tutorials in games then was because we had limited memory and disc space. Everything was on floppy disc. XCOM: UFO Defender came out on 5 1/4 floppy discs, and required a tiny bit of memory space. Not having a tutorial helping you is not a feature of XCOM - it was a limitation. And they fixed that limitation by giving you a manual to read to fill in the gaps.

We had the equivilent of a tutorial in the late 80's and early 90's - it was called the Manual. Your expectation that an XCOM remake shouldn't have a tutorial to help the players start the game and just throw them in there is unfounded. Because it was a great thing for you didn't mean that it was a great thing for a lot of fans - a lot of us who read the manual liked it because it was a good game period. If you want to experience the way you played it the first time, then shut the tutorial off. LOL"

Tuesday, January 17, 2012
"The only one I didn't get was #10. I mean, I remember playing it, but I don't remember that screen. LOL"
Monday, January 16, 2012
"I don't want to sound like I'm bagging on you, but there was a 134 page manual that came with UFO Defense that gave you a lot of information about the game. It does hint that you might want to create your first base in a centralized position like the North Pole so you can react quickly. It does tell you that you will be hiring dozens of soldiers because you're out-matched in the beginning, so you might want to learn the interface. It also tells you a lot about research and intercepting UFOs. And possible tactics.

I learned early on from Microprose that you must RTFM on these games. Masters of Orion taught me that instantly since there's so much you miss if you don't read the manual. Since the tutorial or opening was not very informative in its own. I gather you didn't read the manual for XCOM: UFO Defense or you skimmed it at best. To me it was never "broken."

I think what made XCOM: UFO Defense a superior tactical/strategical game was that it challenged you, even when you were reaching the pinnacle of your research and troops. Even if you had all the tools, the game swarmed you with invasions. Not the lack of information that was right there in the manual if you took the time to read it. I'd prefer a five minute tutorial to the game over a 134 page manual any day, though.

If Firaxis keeps the difficulty and the spirit of the game, that's a win for all of us who have been waiting years for a proper remake of XCOM (not some fan-made rip that seems to fall flat)."

Monday, January 16, 2012