Well, for what it's worth, I like how your last piece has encouraged some decent discussion on Twitter, which I tried to follow on/off the whole day yesterday -- which can be incredibly frustrating, as different threads leads to different people, and before I knew it I had like a dozen browser tabs open lol. But it was enlightening all the same. So thanks for that!
The best thing you can do is be honest with yourself, and I wish you luck in your future writing endeavors.
Thanks, Giancarlo. Imagine how it felt being the author of this and coming in late to that discussion. After it had already ended, really. Or rather, not even knowing there was a discussion until it had already ended. I heard from an acquaintence about this story "making the rounds" and had no idea what was going on.
If nothing else, it's been a good lesson in never underestimating the power of writing things for the Internet. Always be careful with what you say and how you say it.
I guess I kind of got what I wanted. I "made it", however briefly. And it felt horrible, so I guess I made the right choice, after all.
Kinda ironic that an article like that became so insanely popular, huh? I'd be surprised if it isn't high on Bitmob's Top Ten list for March.
Personally, I gave up a career in games journalism a while ago, though it has more to do with a reluctance to relocate than other considerations. I'm more interested in freelancing (and for spare change, not to pay the bills).
I want to be clear that I'm not trying to be discouraging or rude, but both the prior post and this one did rub me the wrong way.
Fact is, very few people are successful in their twenties. And I reject the point that you're too old to go back to school - if you're 26 (as seems to be the case), you'd hardly be an outlier in the classroom. I myself went back to school late, and don't regret it. And, frankly, an education (esp. in liberal arts) is one of the better tools you'll be able to get your hands on. There's also the small matter of being more likely to get bylines in a school paper to cut your teeth, but that's just gravy.
But that's beside the point. Writing about games is your dream job. And if it's one person's dream job, it's probably a lot of other people's dream job. Given the essentially nonexistant "hard" barriers to entry, that means that you're going to be competing against a lot of other people. There's a reason that if you want to be a data-entry specialist, you probably won't have a hard time: it's not what people dream of being when they're young.
There are more people who possess the basic qualifications than there is need for them; that's why the "non-writing" aspects are important. The difference between a "good" and a "great" writer isn't profound. So, churning out quality work consistently just puts you into a heap with a lot of other people. Hence, networking. And, yes, that's discouraging.
I don't want to blow smoke and say that if you want to do this, you should follow your dream. At some point, if you're not getting the results you want, you should hang up your hat. But I think "don't even try" is about as bad advice as you can get. There's an element of chance - that something you write gets read by someone else (like this, or the prior piece) and that's what gets you in the door. But in fields that are staurated with talent (and there are lots), the best way to be successful is just to keep plugging and hope for the best. If that's something you don't feel works for you, then I hope that you find something that suits you well. If you do keep at it, then I sincerely wish you the best of luck.
Thanks, Zach.
So far you're really one of the only people to get all I was really trying to say: this doesn't work for me. The original piece and this one are as simple as that. All it was ever meant to be was an account of my experience and how that experience led me to that conclusion: for better or worse, this isn't for me. I really never intended it to be about anything bigger than myself. I feel that I said as much in the original piece (by saying things like, 'I have myself to blame' and 'business skills are fine but I'm not good at them') but a lot of people focused on a larger issue that I wasn't even trying to get at.
I know I'm not too old to go back to school and I do have an undergraduate education. I merely meant that I'm too invested in pursuing writing or art to be bothered going back for something that's just stable. I may have been vague about that, but thanks for your advice all the same.
Christian, I disagree. I didn't "make it" in games journalism, but I do have a very stable job editing for a magazine. And I don't have a journalism degree or anything directly related to our coverage area (electrical engineering). You're a good writer. Convince employers that you're the guy who will get the job done. Puff your chest out. Getting a stable job isn't near as difficult as "making it" in games journalism.
You accused games journalists of belonging to some elitest club and asked direct questions like "is [encouragement] too much to ask?" - that's the reason your post rubbed people up the wrong way, not the fact you were saying it's not for you.
The second part is fine. The first part isn't, and in my experience simply isn't true. The advice I gave you in the other thread I did because it's disheartening to see someone giving up on their dream. I was an idiot not to give up on it years ago. But it's only by being an idiot (in a very specific, and business-minded, way) that I managed to do what I wanted to do.
Maybe your point is that you didn't want advice any more, you just wanted to rant. But when you rant on the internet, people are going to respond. And a lot of the responses were very smart and considered.
I didn't accuse some kind of game journalist mega-entity of anything. I gave an account of my experiences. I don't understand people telling me that my experience was somehow wrong -- it's what happened.
EDIT: I also admitted that I was emotional, bitter and not entirely rational. A lot of people conveniently ignored that part.
EDIT: You're also making the other huge misconception about the piece -- that it even had a point. I was ending a bad relationship. I said as much when I called it a diary entry.
EDIT: For the record, I'm not referring to these comments. All of these comments and some of the actual responses I saw on line were very smart and considered. But a lot of what I saw elsewhere wasn't, and that's what I'm addressing.
Well, I don't know then. You said in your original blog that "there aren’t many in the club who can be bothered to send the elevator back down," and I tried to offer some useful advice, as did a lot of other people. But your response, at least in part, has been to repeatedly tell me I'm "missing the point". If I am, then I apologise, but I hope you've at least re-evaluated your position on there being very few offers of help forthcoming. Best of luck in whatever you choose to do.
Yes, but that was just a part of it. And I do appreciate all the advice. But I made my decision. It's really nice that people read it and want to help, and maybe other people will see that advice and get something from it and that will be great. Maybe the only good thing to come out of this.
But I made the decision, based on those experiences I already had, to be done. It wasn't a cry for help. I wasn't reaching out for someone to change my mind.










