Separator
The Myth of "Objective" Reviews
Dsc00669
Sunday, August 23, 2009

The dictionary defines the word objective as “expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations.”

By that definition, the term “objective review” is an oxymoron.

Yes, much like leprechauns and unicorns, objective reviews do not exist. And even if they did, you wouldn’t want to read them. Don’t believe me? Here’s an objective review of a recent fighting game that can be used as a template for any future release:

This game is called BlazBlue: Calamity Trigger. It is published by Aksys Games and developed by Arc System Works. It costs $59.99, is rated T, and was released on June 30th. It is on a disc for play on Xbox360 and PS3. There are twelve selectable characters and online versus play.

There you go. A 100% objective review of BlazBlue. Not a single statement made above can be disputed as being biased or open to debate. Of course, there’s also no information about how the game looks, sounds, or plays, i.e., the factors that ultimately help you decide whether it’s worth your money. What would be the point of reading multiple reviews like this? They would all repeat the same useless information.

Objectivity does have its place in reviews. It’s crucial for the facts and features of a game to be accurately reported. However, that’s only half of the responsibility.

A good review should have the reviewer’s viewpoints concisely articulated with solid evidence to support them, instead of words frivolously typed for the sake of color and personality. It should also spark thoughtful introspection over differing opinions, instead of angry dismissal simply because a score was deemed too low or too high.

Most importantly, regardless of whether you agree with it or not, a good review should be the beginning of an open dialogue between yourself, other gamers, and other reviewers, not the end. It’s within that dialogue that experiences are shared, ideas are exchanged, misconceptions are cleared up, and gaming literacy is expanded. And with any luck, all of that leads to more savvy individuals who can recognize a great game for themselves and will settle for nothing less.

Of course, a good review could also lead to message board flame wars where accusations of fanboyism and homosexuality are flung around. That's just a delightful side-effect.

Just be sure to duck when the bile is spewed your way!

 
1
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (5)
Lance_darnell
August 23, 2009
Calvin and Hobbes is the greatest comic strip in the history of print!!!

And:
By that definition, the term “objective review” is an oxymoron.


I could not agree more. When Enter the Matrix came out I thought it was not bad. I am a huge Matrix Fan, so I was obviously biased. It was not until my Friends - who I suggested the game to - told me that it sucked that I started to realize that I was being biased. And they never trusted me again on a game recommendation.

Bm_luke
August 23, 2009
I agree with some of your point, but will always argue with the idea that you should boil out personality. My favorite reviewers aren't emotionless robots, they're extremely subjective souls whose opinions I share - based on some games I've liked, I know I'd like other stuff they recommend.

Likewise I'm seeing warning signs about the "review as opening a dialogue" - it's almost like the Politically Correct bullshit where no-one's allowed to have a definitive opinion. A strong, subjective opinion will provoke just as much debate, in fact more, as long as it's well written and doesn't waste time.
Redeye
August 23, 2009
I personally could never write an objective anything. Writing objectively is a research paper and that bores me to tears to have to write. I prefer to just wail out my opinions as honestly as possible and then learn through discussing with the people who respond to it and reconsider my opinion and back up my arguments on the fly. It's just more fun for me to do. It's important to know what parts of your understanding are objective fact vs subjective opinion and it's important to realize when you may be wrong and rethink your opinion, but it's in no way important to be devoid of individual bias or personality.
John-wayne-rooster-cogburn
August 23, 2009
First of all, that is one of my favorite Calvin and Hobbes. Second, I definitely agree. I think the trick is finding a reviewer who shares similar tastes in games as yourself.

Default_picture
August 23, 2009
I actually browse multiple sites when I'm checking reviews for a game I might want to buy. If there are mixed scores, there are some that I'll trust more than others when I get ready to make the final decision. However, part of the reason I do check different sites is for different personalities and perspectives. There's something to be said for reviews that have dissenting opinions when compared to other reviews. They give you a different side of the story that you can reference when you make you purchase decision.

There should be some level of objectivity to balance out the personality, though. There's nothing wrong with letting personality shine, but reviewers also need to maintain a certain dedication to sticking to the facts and making sure the pertinent information gets through clearly.

You made some good points here and I liked reading this.
You must log in to post a comment. Please register or Connect with Facebook if you do not have an account yet.