Separator

Darwin's Theory of Storytelling Evolution

Default_picture
Friday, March 11, 2011
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Rob Savillo

William offers an interesting analogy for the progression of narrative devices by looking to Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection. Do games similarily "evolve"?

Imagine, if you will, that the video-game landscape and industry that we have all known, loved, and grown up with for the last twenty-five years was actually a biosphere within itself. This collection of life would be a thriving environment in which a constant fluidity of change occur in a natural way.

Charles Darwin, best known for his work contributing to the theory of evolution in his book On the Origin of Species, posited that natural selection was the act of traits and mutations carrying on through the lineage of a species while inferior characteristics died off with the weaker flora and fauna. We can use this idea to look at the steady evolution of storytelling in gaming through the last two decades.

Lately, games with an emphasis on narrative have been finding their way into my PlayStation 3 and PC with regularity. In the last six months, I have played (to either completion or in some degree) Mass Effect 1 and 2, Dragon Age: Origins, Infamous, Demon’s Souls, Assassin’s Creed, and Dante’s Inferno. These titles -- not to mention my trophy list -- make evident that I play a lot of story-driven games in general.

But my thoughts weren’t pushed onto the proverbial paper until I bought Dragon Age 2 this past Tuesday...and then realized that strong mutations carry on in a strain for survival while the weaker ones flounder and are thrown back into the ether.

 

While playing Dragon Age 2, BioWare’s storytelling choices from the previous installment were very much on my mind. Origins had done many things that always seemed like it was the longest way of doing something. The somewhat archaic text trees combined with a silent protagonist always felt hollow, like my character wasn’t so much being a master of his own destiny but being controlled by a puppeteer.

Of course, he was. But, why is it then that by giving Dragon Age 2’s main character, Hawke, a voice of her own that BioWare has immediately made the story more personal and engrossing? Suddenly, I cared about the relationships, trials, and tribulations of Hawke and her family far more than if she stood silently while her companions remedied her Charlie Chaplin routine. A shift had occurred in the Dragon Age series, where it almost felt like you were being taken in on the ground level of your epic adventure instead of silently watching from the rafters.

BioWare, and a few other developers, have seen natural selection take place in their own titles. One example is the storytelling changes made between Mass Effect 1 and 2, where a shift in the personal interactions between protagonist Sheppard and your crew took place. Suddenly, these were more intimate encounters devised of levity and a human touch, even with characters with not-so-human features.

Some franchises aren’t always so lucky to progress in storytelling with such grace. One glaring example would be the recent failures of the Star Wars: The Force Unleashed series, which saw a shift from an engrossing-narrative worth of level-1, Lucasfilm canon to a traipse around the two same environments with Boba Fett giggling in the background like Gargamel from Smurfs.

What happened? A lack of evolution. What worked once didn’t work again, as I found myself wondering how exactly the same guy could abuse Darth Vader twice, with the second fight being with a supposed unstable clone (or wasn’t he? Apparently, the writers couldn’t decide and left that out). 

Force Unleashed sank to the bottom of the gaming seas, and what was supposed to be a highly anticipated sequel was merely an example showing that if you do not progress and adapt you will suffer the consequences.

Other developers have caught on to the wave of giving players something new. A great example is the upcoming Infamous 2 in which developer Sucker Punch has taken a page or two out of BioWare’s book by offering a continuing storyline from your previous game -- as well as a more intimate look at your hero (or villain). Additionally, Infamous 2 will allow users to create missions, which adds another level to the storytelling biosphere. This adaptation from the LittleBigPlanet series could very well be something we see more of in the future, not just from PC releases typically known for this level of community interaction.

Evolve or die. This is a simple mantra that every developer should take to heart in this new age of technology and ever-aging consumers. We crave and require more than a screen telling us our princess is in another castle, yet we are still giddy with joy with the same character traits of a Krogan looking up T. rexes and alien pornography (oh, Grunt). With the gaming biosphere ever changing, we as consumers can only hope that the medium evolves along with us…or we may go back to getting our story for a game from the user manual.


Originally posted at digitalhippos.com.

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (5)
Robsavillo
March 11, 2011

I'm not sure I necessarily agree with the analogy...Force Unleashed received much criticism from a gameplay perspective, too. And some of the most popular shooters continually recycle the same narrative devices and trite storylines over and over...and sell like crazy. (If we continue with the analogy, I imagine that selling copies to be the equivalent of reproduction.)

I appreciate BioWare's efforts, but I think other, lesser-selling games advance narrative in much more interesting and beneficial ways (e.g., Digital: A Love Story, Atom Zombie Smasher, Demon's Souls).

Default_picture
March 11, 2011

Yup, silent-protagonist is the crap that all gullible,pathetic new-gaming-journalists eat up as groundbreaking, because 'it enables the players to imbue the characters they are assuming as with their own characters',as if playing videogames is a form of acting. Here is an article on it:

http://www.thunderboltgames.com/opinion/article/keep-freeman-quiet-opinion-for-pc.html

As much as i don't care about videogame-storytelling, because i think it has the same artistic integrity as porn-storytelling (Heck, i  even think Debbie Does Dallas has a more coherent plot than Mass Effect 2),i think those 'character interactions' could be compelling if we can relate to them, such as those in Persona 3 and Persona 4, where we interfere in everyday life's problem of characters in them, with real problems of modern life and not some geeky,nerdy space opera bullshit or geeky,nerdy fantasy bullshit that utimately ends in helping them killing some people they don't like.

Default_picture
March 11, 2011

Nice article, Will.

I agree that storytelling needs to continue to evolve if the stories themselves want to survive in the minds of players.

Though in the case of the Dragon Age series, Dragon Age 2 hasn’t shown in the same light despite the addition of my protagonist’s personality. By simple contrast, the story for the sequel (so far) doesn’t compare to the grand tale of the original. It feels like a knock-off; a subdued adventure. I’m hoping as I continue on that BioWare can change my mind.

The Force Unleashed 2 was a disaster on multiple accounts: Narrative, overly simplistic combat, gimmicky mechanics, hand-holding, and blockbuster set pieces all contribute to its failure. I understand the development team put a lot of work into the product, but it felt like a labor of perceived profit rather than a labor of love and dedication; which is unfortunate.

Default_picture
March 11, 2011

Honestly, I'm perfectly fine with DA2 not going for an epic tale kind of story. I feel with a silent, to be created hero that kind of story is easier to pull off. My favorite moments of DA so far have been the more personal person to person storylines and events that have happened. I don't need my adventures to be epic, just compelling. This kinda links to what Roger is talking about. You're living the day to day lives and thoughts of your party, not prancing around from giant monster to giant monster. I feel more connected. Especially when I hit on two girls at once in the game, of course.

I think the thing that angers me most about Force Unleashed 2 was that the developers blatantly lied about listening to the complaints of the first game. They went on and on in the press about how they were making drastic changes and really listening to their consumers... and the only thing they did was add two useless force powers and chuck a storyline at you that was literally "Hey! Look! It's Boba Fett! Over there! You guys like him, right?!? RIGHT?!?!?!".

Tis a shame, because the first game's story is among my favorites (even if the gameplay was fairly ass at times).

Default_picture
March 12, 2011

I actually like my silent hero in DA Origins more than DA 2's hero. I also like talking heroes as well. I guess it depends on the game for me.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.