Modders aren't cheaters: Developer DICE shouldn't ban Battlefield 3 fans for color mod

Default_picture
Monday, October 08, 2012
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Rob Savillo

Last week, news broke that DICE disapproves of a color-grading mod for its first-person shooter Battlefield 3 and may issue bans for those using it. Does this "hack" really constitute a cheat, and even if it does, should using it be a bannable offense?

Battlefield 3

Most modern military shooters have so few different colors that I can count all of it with one hand. That isn't a good thing as it just makes the game look like a brand-new coloring book for military-Hollywood fans.

Battlefield 3 is such a game without a vibrant color palette; however, modders might be able to help with the PC version. A video of the modders' work definitely makes Battlefield 3 more beautiful, but using this mod could lead to a permanent ban.

 

When the video was shown to Battlefield 3 gameplay designer Gustav Halling, he called it "too colorful" and warned of possible bans. "Also, I wouldn't use those hacks if you don't want a permanent ban on your account," tweeted Halling (now removed). "FYI warning."

So far, a few posters on a reddit thread have claimed that they were banned for using this mod. Maybe DICE is banning anyone from using this mod as it makes hostile forces more noticeable without the grey tint covering the player's eyes.

I know part of the job with game developers is to make sure cheaters don't ruin the experience of the game even for Battlefield 3. Part of what keeps these players goingis the multiplayer, and having a poor experience from a hacker always killing everyone with bots or cheats will ruin the experience fast.

But is this really hacking? Another part of selling a game is to make it visually appealing. Modders are always working to improve games' graphics -- even old (but great) games like Thief 2 and Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind.

One concern DICE might have is that if hackers can change the color of the game, then they might be closer to changing the core mechanics to implement cheating tools. But if a player was just using this mod for single-player games, then it shouldn't be a problem, right? Unless DICE wants to label all modders as cheaters -- the same people who gave us DayZ, DOTA, and Team Fortress.


[Source: PC Gamer]

 
Problem? Report this post
ALEXANDER KRAUS' SPONSOR
Comments (6)
Default_picture
October 05, 2012

I think DICE should really give people a break. Battlefield 3 is a great game, but the modders really helped build the multiplayer scene in the first place. In my opinion, the only cheaters are the people who download auto-aim mods to demolish everyone else. (There are more examples, but I'll settle with this for now)

Besides, people are bound to eventually find the one gun to gain the upper hand over everyone. And yes, I am referring to Counter-Strike's stupid AWP.

Default_picture
October 08, 2012

"Maybe DICE is banning anyone from using this mod as it makes hostile forces more noticeable without the grey tint covering the player's eyes."

This article answered its own question.  You cannot allow anyone to have any type of unfair advantage in multiplayer.  Simple as that.  

To rebut that though.

"But if a player was just using this mod for single-player games, then it shouldn't be a problem, right?"

If I am using a mod in single player and I get banned, I would never ever spend a single penny on that company again, while doing what any mad video game nerd would do and tarnish them online in whatever way I could.

Default_picture
October 09, 2012

The bigger issue is the lockdown DICE has on the game. Unlike various other multiplayer FPS games like TF2 which allow you to create your own servers and play in non-sanctioned ways, there is no other option for players of BF3. So when something that comes out that improves the game (you should see how the game looks without that crappy filter on. So much better in my eyes), DICE can simply say "No, you play it the way WE want you to play and no other way". Now for MMOs where you're only leasing space on the server, this is fine, but for a game which (really should) be run standalone, this is disgusting.

Bmob
October 09, 2012

Disgusting, and yet exactly what weu agree to when purchasing their 'license'. It's the same story as hundreds of other software complaints, just with a different lick of paint... Geddit?

Default_picture
October 09, 2012
Sandy's right. Consumers should be aware that, even though a game might be on the PC, not every developer is fine with consumers modding their product. However calling all mods a hack is disrespectful towards people that work on these mods. I'm pretty sure a big chunk of modders will avoid any game of DICE in the future if this kind of decision continues.
Bmob
October 09, 2012

Absolutely. It's simple PR. Calling any part of your audience cheaters (even genuine cheaters)--ESPECIALLY a part of your audience which is by design more 'connected'--is going to have ramifications.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.