PlayStation 3D Display: Eyes-on impressions

Shoe_headshot_-_square
Wednesday, November 09, 2011

I honestly didn't think anyone would care about this thing:

When Sony unveiled the PlayStation 3D Display at this past summer's Electronic Entertainment Expo trade show, I had one thought: "Wake me up when they announce a bigger one." I mean, seriously...a 24" monitor? Aren't we Americans used to (much) bigger and (much) better? Hell, my tech-snobby eyes don't acknowledge anything under 40" when perusing the HDTV aisles at Best Buy.

Then Sony sent us a model for review just a little ahead of its November 13 release. I casually Tweeted/Facebooked out that the 3D Display "...is very slick. Widescreen, smooth, decent sound. Looks like a giant PSP, too." I expected some people to scoff, mainly at its diminutive stature...or perhaps at its hefty $499.99 price tag.

Interestingly enough, replies to my Tweetbooking indicated that gamers are actually excited about the PS 3D Display. Some of my friends who tried it out at my pad really thought it was cool as well. And when my girlfriend caught me zoning out with the 3D glasses on, admiring the backgrounds in Ratchet & Clank: All 4 One for way, way longer than I had intended for Display-testing purposes ("You look stoned," she said), I realized I was enjoying bite-sized stereoscopic gaming. I guess it says something when I chose to spend time staring into this monitor when my 65-inch HD behemoth was slumbering just a few feet away.

Now, I'm no hardware expert. I'm not here to tell you how well the PlayStation 3D Display specs out or how compares to other televisions. But I checked out the machine with some friends, judging it in the various categories below (including the touted SimulView feature, which allows two players to see two different images on the same monitor, eliminating the need for splitscreen gaming)....

 

Initial impressions

The PlayStation 3D Display definitely passes the first-look test -- if this thing could walk, people would be rubbernecking to get a second glance. It is extremely thin (about 0.75" thick, not counting the base or the rear panel) and looks as though Apple could've designed it, with an ultra-minimalistic design. By the way, even though this is a 24" monitor, the official tech specs lists the effective screen size as 23.5", which takes up most of the front-facing real estate.

The rest of the frame houses the speakers and accents the unit nicely, adding no bulk or unsightliness. It's almost iPad-like in looks, with the rounded sides giving it a PSP vibe. One commenter, who works at Sony, agrees: "We've been saying that over here for weeks," says @Nikoro. "As if there are giant PSP Go buttons and control pad about to slide out from the back."

Almost everyone who's stopped by and looked at the Display thinks it looks mighty nice. "It's the perfect dorm-room gaming TV," says one of my friends.

Practicality

"Dorm-room gaming TV" may be the perfect role for the Display, as it's way too small to use as a typical family's primary window to electronic entertainment. It supports component video, has two HDMI ports, and also offers one headphone jack. So unless you're still rocking that Atari 2600, you should be OK, connection-wise.

If you end up buying the PS 3D Display, I would recommend springing for the not-included remote control. All of the default buttons are behind the monitor, out of sight (if you hit any, an on-screen menu will pop up, showing you what all the functions are in the back). The "volume-up" key has a little bump, so it's easier to find that one and feel the others out in relation to it, but it's still not easy to navigate any of the hardware menus to adjust things like the treble/bass/contrast/etc.

The glasses

These are the larger, bulkier "active" glasses (vs. the passive ones you typically use in movie theaters) that Sony likes to use for their 3D TVs, only with a silver PlayStation logo on the side. They have adjustable nose pads, they fit over eyeglasses, and they apparently make you look like you might've been smoking pot.

It's easy to switch between first- and second-player modes (more on that below in the SimulView section), but I don't like that these each have two separate power switches. Don't ask -- I don't understand why these were designed this way.

The 3D

I don't want to say a lot here, because I haven't seen enough at-home 3D to do any honest, objective comparisons. Let's just say it works well on a handful of games that I tested out (All 4 One, MotorStorm Apocalypse, and Uncharted 3, the latter requiring a just-released patch to make the 3D work properly).

On some titles, you might need to scale back the 3D strength via in-game options. I usually want my 3D as in-my-face-and-eyes as possible, but setting this too high can cause some shadowing effects that make images look a little blurry. Toning this down will probably save you future trips to the medicine cabinet for aspirin.

SimulView

This feature easily amazed everyone who tried it during my testing, including myself. For games that support it (currently from Sony: MotorStorm Apocalypse, Gran Turismo 5, and Killzone 3), it essentially turns a two-player splitscreen experience into a fullscreen one.

The PlayStation 3D Display will output each player's image onto the screen at the same time, but setting the glasses to different modes (player one and player two) will make them filter out the other signal. That means each participant will only see his own game while peeping the same screen. Yes, it's a little like magic.

The image quality drops a bit in SimulView mode -- it's not as bright or vivid as a dedicated fullscreen picture, and it doesn't support stereoscopic 3D. But heck if I ever want to go back to sharing one television with someone else. It's just too bad Sony doesn't make it mandatory for developers to support this feature for all PS3 games.

We'd Photoshop in some screenshots to show you a more realistic portrayal of how SimulView works, but this marketing image was just too ridiculous to not show you guys.

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (9)
Mindjack
November 09, 2011

For $500, not only would I expect all PS3 games to feature SimulView (what a stupid name), I'd also expect the monitor to do the dishes, walk the dog, and give me a foot massage every night.

Default_picture
November 10, 2011

I'd expect it to write all my stories for me, so that I don't have to think so hard.

:P

Shoe_headshot_-_square
November 10, 2011

Samir, I'll do all that stuff for you for much, much less.

Mindjack
November 10, 2011

Photo0084
November 09, 2011

I just wonder why they didnt go for the 32-37 inch size. That would get more people interested in it.

Samir,  not everyone has a nice HD tv yet, my best friend still uses a 27 inch CRT that he got around 2003 or so.

For $500 bucks I would go for it if I didn't have HD yet. The 3D is a nice bonus on top of that.

Default_picture
November 10, 2011

I got my first HDTV this year for $599.99 and it's 42". It doesn't have 3D but I still think Sony's display is priced too high. Also got my first LCD monitor recently and it's the same size as this Sony display. Again, no 3D, and it's not a television, but after a sale and rebate it was only $140. I know 3D adds to a price, though I'd guess $300-400 would be more reasonable compared to other televisions.

Default_picture
November 10, 2011

This seems small and overpriced to me for what it provides in the way of features. I mean, it's pretty and all, but that seems to be the only thing that separates it from the sea of HDTVs out there already.

Shoe_headshot_-_square
November 10, 2011

I didn't make a final judgment call on whether this is worth the $500 or not, because it will greatly depend on your needs. Do you only need an HDTV? Then of course not. Will you be doing a lot of 3D viewing? Maybe. Is the size right for your space? Will you be doing a lot of SimulView gaming with a friend? Etc.

But yeah...it is pretty pricey if you say "no" to more than one of those....

Comic061111
November 10, 2011

I'd be tempted to spend $200 for the tv + glasses if all it did was simulview- and all (or enough) games supported it.  Because that sounds really really cool.

Alas this is not reality.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.