Because it doesn't have a single player mode. Only multiplayer which you can play solo."
I find stories like this so much more interesting than playing it, though."
That's $20,771.44 USD in damages for a cost of $7,299.05 USD, using an online converter I found for ISK to USD."
Personally, I agree, though I always take a high life counter to be a sign of pride."
A failed console is the Saturn and similar in my mind (Jaguar, etc), with the Dreamcast being the weird buffer area- it definitely failed financially, but even though I bought the system brand new for cheaper than a video game costs these days, I still go back to it from time to time.
I guess I tend to judge consoles on the quality of their games more than sales or computing power."
I dunno, maybe it's because I don't have high expectations for consoles in general - I only recently picked up a PS3 a few months ago because there were finally enough games that I would like to play on it, combined with my 360 having to be sent back for warranty replacement a second time since I bought it a few years back.
As it will be HD or near-HD, it's already going to be more expensive than the Wii, I'd imagine, and the price point is the main reason the Wii did as well as it did. If it had been more expensive there would've been a price barrier keeping 'casual' gamers from picking it up,"
That goes beyond 'not fair' as far as statements go, I think. Wii U is already more specialized than the Wii, and I don't think the Wii's demographic is the Wii U's demographic.
I'll get one when I know I can play Nintendo games in high def. That's pretty much the reason I buy any Nintendo console."

