From game critic to game creator: 5 levels of understanding

Default_picture
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Dan "Shoe" Hsu

Remember Michael Donahoe of EGM/Bitmob fame? Well, he's a game designer now! See his latest project at www.ruined.com, and read below to see how he handled the transition from reviewer to developer.

Level 4: Monetization

Games need developers to make them. And before they can do that, they need companies to fund said developers. And in order to do that, they need people like you to spend money on their products. So what the hell are you waiting for? Go buy a game, dammit! Making money, however, is a touchy subject, especially in the free-to-play sector.

Free-to-play titles (with microtransactions) are a lot different than console games because you’re trying to please two very different gamers: 1) those who play for free and 2) those who are willing to spend cash. That means, in order to get free players to spend money, you have to entice them with valuable items and/or gameplay changes that will give them a significant advantage over non-paying customers. Of course, this doesn’t always have to be the case, as it’s possible to offer things that don’t affect gameplay (costume packs, special privileges, etc.).

With Ruined, we’re trying our best to make something that is fun for both paying and non-paying players. We currently have a moneization scheme, but we're holding it back for the time being to bolster a big enough community to support it.

That means you should play our game right now. Seriously, come back and read the rest of this crap later. Stop reading this sentence. And this one. Are you playing Ruined yet? Go!


Level 5: Time

Without a watch, you’re screwed if you want to tell time. Without time, developers are screwed if they want to make a good game.

I never quite understood how long it takes to make one when I worked at EGM. Sure, I know it takes a good two or three years for a high-budget production, but I couldn't really process what that meant until I actually saw firsthand what it takes to make a game from the ground up.

With Ruined, we made everything from scratch (with the exception of our engine, Unity). Like I said earlier, this is the first U.S.-developed project at our company, so it meant we were the guinea pigs. It also meant we had to learn how to make everything work perfectly...very, very quickly.

Time is the biggest enemy for any game in development, and now I understand why titles like L.A. Noire take multiple years to complete. Quality takes time. Without it, you’re left with a backlog of amazing ideas that may or may not come to fruition.

For instance, with Ruined, we originally had five to six modes planned, multiple character skins and costumes, and a skill tree for long-lasting play. So what made it into the game? Two modes: deathmatch and team deathmatch. That’s it! Not by choice, mind you.

But luckily for us, we have the ability to add new features periodically thanks to this being an online game. Still, development time is something I never really comprehended as a reviewer. It’s so easy to sit back on our couches and whine and complain about how what we’re playing doesn’t have a lot of content. Hell, I did it for a living! But now I truly understand why this is. And that’s why I don’t wear a watch! Time sucks.


Final boss: Making money

We’re currently gearing up to fight the final boss right now, and hopefully we’ll win (*crosses fingers*). In the meantime, you can help the battle by checking out our game at www.ruined.com. And by help, I mean spend $1-$5,000 when we eventually put content in the store. Preferably the latter figure.

Thanks! Y’all are the best.

 
Prevarrow 1 2
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (6)
Justme
May 31, 2011

Great perspective on reviewing vs. creating games.  Thanks for giving us that unique glimpse into the industry.

Mikeshadesbitmob0611
May 31, 2011

THANK YOU. I say this kind of thing all the time and people scoff because I don't have credentials like you do. Maybe now some people will start to understand the realities of game development.

Shoe_headshot_-_square
May 31, 2011

I really dig this article, cause Donahoe's crazy personality comes right through in it. :)

Wile-e-coyote-5000806
June 01, 2011

I think it was Peter Jackson who said that you never finish a movie, you run out of time.  Games are obviously similar in that regard.

People generally tend to underestimate how difficult other people's jobs are (it's one thing that I love about the shows Dirty Jobs and Undercover Boss).  With video games, you have to realize that tons of people want to work in that industry, so those companies can hire people with proven ability.  When a feature gets left out of a game, it is not because of laziness.  I always think it is best to assume that people are well intentioned and doing the best they can until they have proven otherwise.

Now, can somebody write an article like this about DLC?  It may sometimes be, but is not always an evil money-grab.

Default_picture
June 02, 2011

Glad you guys dug the article! It's really crazy how much people don't know about how games are made. It's understandable, for sure, but I think if people knew all the crap that goes into them, they may be a wee bit more understanding of the some decisions we have to make. Still, complaining is so easy! THIS COMMENT SUCKS!

Default_picture
June 02, 2011

There are still plenty of people who will continue to not understand these basic principles. Some reviewers think their ideas on how to fix the game haven't previously been considered.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.