Saving an empty galaxy: Why a Mass Effect 4 is impossible

Default_picture
Tuesday, March 27, 2012

It's not easy creating motivation to save an empty, lifeless galaxy. I'm talking about losing the suspension of disbelief, taking out the implied habitations, and looking at the numbers. How many people did you see on earth? Maybe a few dozen marines, bustling through the military complex, and a small gathering of the ruling officers and their lackey's when the Reapers attacked. Then one or dead humans here, a small child there, and then a cityscape with millions of implied lives.


When you start looking at galaxy-wide populations, things get even more underwhelming. The problem is this monkey brain of ours, we just can't conjure up sympathy for that many things. The citadel implies scale and population. I can gaze out towards the distant buildings and atriums, presumably filled with thousands, maybe millions, of habitants. You have to agree to the illusion, you have to want to believe. Because the evidence says otherwise, whether it's the handful of people on the five levels your elevator will take you on the Citadel, or the few dozen scientists rescued and their implied families or the imagined Krogans inhabiting their homeworld, the actual number of aliens and people you see is small.

It's a technical limitation to be sure, our technology can't sustain the number of characters on-screen to properly simulate a crowd, and it's a simple cheat movies, television and games have to get around. But when you put such an impetus on the player, when you start using the word "million" with a "b" you had better be committed to some elaborate illusion. Bioware does admirably, giving us the feeling of scale using the galaxy map, adding lifeless planets around the solar systems in addition to the living ones. But in the end, I just don't buy it. Bioware bites off more than our technology can chew, and everything suffers as a result.

A galaxy full of life


What killed the momentum for me was a moment of eavesdropping. One crew mate extolled the gravity of our situation, wondering how many billions of lives were being lost every day. Millions of souls lost while I shopped on the citadel or talked with Joker and EDI on my ship. The tension is ratcheted up so high it implodes in on itself, that momentum is impossible to keep up, but there's no going back. Anything short of extinction of species is paltry after the first ten minutes of the game, and even the quiet moments suffocate, overshadowed by the need to keep the galactic readiness rising.


    There is nowhere to go but up. In mere moments entire races are obliterated, a moment's hesitation, a renegade or paragon twitch-prompt could mean the end of an entire race. Boom, there's another species irrevocably changed forever by my decisions. It's addicting, this feeling of gravity and importance, but ultimately the crescendo of increasingly important actions creates a fever pitch.


    I have not finished Mass Effect 3, but without a doubt, I believe Shepherd has to die. We have created a being so monumental, his achievements so astounding, there is nothing left for him to do except ascend to godhood. What could possibly top repelling the Reaper invasion in Mass Effect 4? What could possibly be more threatening than this army of supernatural war-gods bent on our destruction? How could Bioware possibly raise the stakes on all life in the galaxy? The sheer scale of the conflict ensured Shepherd's demise, because he only exists as long as there is interest in the story, and there is only interest with conflict. There can be no conflict, at least interesting conflict, after the Reapers. The headline from Mass Effect 4 cannot be "Shepherd quells Krogan rebellion with paragon dialogue and his shotgun," it has to be bigger than its predecessor or nothing at all.


Mass Effect strives to create scale with some success, but where Bioware truly succeeds is in the small stories. The intimate details of a navy pilot's lifelong struggle with a physical disability, a young quarian seeking to find her place in a strict culture, and a commander fighting against racial prejudice to create unity on his ship.


The scale is sometimes summed up in two, maybe three characters, each with an agenda, differing worldviews and distrust. Bioware, and this is where they shine, weaves us into the conflict between a friends or a neighbour and asks, "What would you say?"


These are the moments when my heart jumps into my throat, these are the decisions that cause us to weigh carefully our actions. Because when momentum pulls us through increasingly higher and higher stakes, we often forget what really matters.
  

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (4)
Lolface
March 27, 2012

Mass Effect 3 applied the same single city aspect of Dragon Age II, and achieves the same result of a dead, static world. What also kills the momentum in ME3 a bit is a severe lack of urgency. While Reapers are destroying Earth and every other world in the galaxy, Commander Shepard is running around being the best courier in Citadel by creepily eavesdropping on every conversation. Also, in the middle of saving the galaxy from the Reaper threat, Admiral Hacket sees fit to give Commander Shepard a bunch of extra missions because apparently there are no other Alliance ships (or any other military entity, like Spectres) in the ME universe that actually do anything.

And there is definitely going to be another Mass Effect game. I don't know if it will be ME4, but BioWare has built Mass Effect as a multimedia franchise. Although ME3 is the end of Shepard's story, it is not the end of Mass Effect.

Default_picture
March 28, 2012

Yeah, the single city concept simplifies things, but there's something about entering a new city just knowing there's some shiny new guns available to puchase at a new shop. And it feels a little odd going to the specter terminal and authorizing a bunch legislation, I mean, shouldn't people with an understanding of economies and business being deciding how personnel are paid? Yet the real benefit of being a specter, having access to high end weaponry, is way too expensive to afford. 200,000 credits? really? What's the point of having access to something i can't buy? Where is my specter discount?

And you're right, there will be more Mass Effects, but probably not with Shepherd.

Dscn0568_-_copy
April 02, 2012

Did you mean to submit this for last month's Bitmob Writing Challenge? It's well written, but it talks more about Mass Effect 3 specifically than what the prompt asks. I have your earlier article on TV's portrayal of gaming accounted for, and if you have a good reason why it should be included I'm willing to listen.

Default_picture
April 02, 2012

Oh, sorry yeah I meant to add this one to the Mass Effect 3 writing challenge!

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.