Separator

Hollywood will never cast a game movie right

Rm_headshot
Friday, January 28, 2011

Anybody who's played Uncharted: Drake's Fortune or Uncharted 2: Among Thieves knows exactly who should play Nathan Drake in the Uncharted movie: Mark Wahlberg. I mean, have you seen that guy act? He brings both his facial expressions to the party, and he brings them hard.

All right, fine. We all know only Nathan Fillion deserves to wear Drake's trademark shoulder holster. I even saw a YouTube video of a superfan telling Uncharted director David O. Russell -- to his face -- that Whalberg was a mistake and Fillion a perfect win for the role. Soon after, rumors swirled that Whalberg had dropped out. The internet held its breath for an announcement.


What would Dirk Diggler do?

In truth, that fan pretty much nixed any slender chance Fillion had.

A lot of factors go into casting a movie. As considerations go, fan opinion ranks somewhere below who's catering the on-set grub. But that's not the only reason Hollywood might never cast a video-game movie right again.

 

Let's start with the basics. David O. Russell signed Mark Wahlberg to play Drake because Marky Mark fit three major criteria for the job;

1.    He's an A-list name who can open a movie.
2.    His price tag works within the film's budget.
3.    He's worked with Russell several times before.

In a nutshell, that's what goes wrong every single time. Money, money, and relationships.

Two things determine what kind of a budget event movies like an Uncharted, a Resident Evil, or a BloodRayne get: the director and the star. Both need a track record of delivering films moviegoers line up for, and every star's bankability on opening weekend is a matter of public record. When Vin Disel dropped out of Hitman, a chunk of budget went with him. Most game movies don’t start with a huge budget to begin with. They hire who they can afford, so the production went with a cheaper, lesser-known lead...Timothy Olyphant, one quality badass in Deadwood and Justified but horribly miscast as Agent 47.


You're not fooling anyone, baldy.

On the other hand, when a proven director (Mike Newell) and a big-name actor (Jake Gyllenhaal) step aboard a project, you get a summer CGI-fest like Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time. Never mind that Gyllenhaal's several shades too white to pass as a mere citizen of Persia, much less royalty. He brought people into the theaters...people who never played the game, or even knew they were watching something based on a game.

So it's always a juggle between what a movie can afford and what star power can return. Adding a small request like appropriate casting might be asking too much, particularly when you consider how outrageous and larger-than-life most game characters are.

Certainly, the stars aligned when Angelina Jolie played Lara Croft. You can bet Jack Black would've gotten a feature-length Brutal Legend rolling if the game hadn't tanked, with himself reprising the role of Eddie Riggs. He probably would’ve brought along a director he knew and trusted to helm it.

Relationships like that are incredibly strong in Hollywood, and so are the egos. That fan talking up Nathan Fillion tried to turn Russell onto a great thing, but Russell already had his "great thing": an actor he knows and trusts. And he clearly didn't appreciate this nobody questioning his choice of heroic lead.


Ladies and gentlemen, Jamie Foxx, Bruce Willis, and Jennifer Aniston.

See, directors don't like to be dictated to by anyone. They are the captains of their ships, you're not privy to their vision for your game, and they don't care what you think. That’s why internet campaigns never work.

Put it all together and you get Mark Wahlberg as Nathan Drake and Max Payne, Jean-Claude Van Damme in Street Fighter, Keanu Reaves attached to Bioshock, Bruce Willis and Jamie Foxx set to play Kane & Lynch, respectively. Names you know. And when the reviews come out, maybe they'll slam Wahlberg for not bringing the empathy, lightness, and charm that makes Nathan Drake such a great character. If so, Russell can blame us for not accepting his film for what it is.

But we shouldn't. These are adaptations, and like any adaptation, the further you stray from the source material, the stronger your justification must be. Bringing a game to the silver screen presents unique challenges, but we spend hundreds of hours with these characters, as these characters. They are our anchor through these experiences. Get them right and the rest falls into place.

Until then, a good video-game movie simply won't happen.

 
Problem? Report this post
RUS MCLAUGHLIN'S SPONSOR
Comments (12)
Default_picture
January 28, 2011

Have you seen The Fighter, which David O. Russell and Mark Wahlberg worked on? The movie is phenomenal and Whalberg does a great job in it. Before seeing that movie I was iffy on the whole project, but if they can pull off the quality they did in that movie, it will be easily the best video game movie of all time.

Default_picture
January 28, 2011

Who the hell is Nathan Fillion?  Maybe the reason he wasn't cast is because nobody has ever heard of the guy.

Wile-e-coyote-5000806
January 28, 2011

@ Justin:  Watch the short-lived but excellent sci-fi series "firefly" (it's on Hulu), its movie "Serenity" or, to a lesser degree, the TV show "Castle".  Nathan Fillion is perfect for Nathan Drake.  In fact, the first time I played the demo of the first Uncharted game, I thought "If they ever make a movie, they have got to get Fillion to play this guy."  What you say, though, is exactly right.  For a big movie, you need to have star power to get people into the seats.  I am a fan of Nathan Fillion, but he isn't very well known.

I do think that Mark Wahlberg could pull off playing Nathan Drake, though.  Perhaps more important is the fact that Amy Hennig at one point had said that, while she couldn't talk about who was being looked at, Naughty Dog was happy with the choice at that time, which was presumably Wahlberg.

This article has it right.  Video game adaptation movies will never look at who is the best actor for the role, because they will always be made as money-grabs.  The summer action movie is all that Hollywood will see in any video game.

Photo_159
January 28, 2011

Nice job Rus. You certainly bring to light an angle which many people forget to consider when trying to understand tragedies like game cinema. That angle is more or less the perspective of the people who actally make the content.

I am surprised you didn't bring up David O. Russel's past history with George Clooney...or that gnarley out take from I heart Huckabees. I will link them:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4Qls1rAfYs

http://www.filmjunk.com/2008/04/22/david-o-russell-strikes-again-james-caan-walks-off-set-of-nailed/

@Justin
It would seem normal that maybe the general public wouldn't know who Nathan Fillion is but if you are an industry professionl I would think it's part of your job to know somebody like Fillion - Sure maybe he is a bit small time but certainly not unrecognizeable. A directors job should be to see a his vision through. Rus kind of elludes to the idea that a directors vision of a video game film will never line up with ours due to their personal tastes for comfort and success. Honestly, I think Fillion is a little too old to play Drake but that doesn't mean David O. Russel should get off easy by not doing his homework. It's pain stakingly obvious to us who have played the game that Walberg seems like a terrible match up. Russel probably never played the game so he doesn't understand why we are all in an uproar...even if he did - juding by the above links - i doubt that he would care.

4540_79476034228_610804228_1674526_2221611_n
January 28, 2011

I'm so not on board with the Nathan Fillion hype. Look up the guy's track record. His movies are garbage. Mark Wahlberg is an underrated actor. He's handsome and athletic (like drake) -  I have faith he'll pull off the role..the talent is there. Timothy Oliphant is an outstanding actor who had the misfortune of being cast for Hitman, a movie with a terrible script and so-so director.  Watch the HBO original series Deadwood if you want to see Oliphant in a convincing role.

My point is at the end of the day the actor won't matter as much as the director and script. Seeing as how the creator of Deadwood is doing the Uncharted movie, and Wahlberg is portraying Drake, I feel like this project has promise.

Default_picture
January 28, 2011

@Michael: Nathan Fillion's personality alone is a spitting image of Nathan Drake, and I'd hardly call "Slither" garbage. Not only that, but he's better known as a TV actor. I like Mark Wahlberg, but he's no Nathan Drake.

Default_picture
January 29, 2011

If Hollywood can't do it right, why not give the reigns to an independent studio? Sure, they might not have the financial support Hollywood can easily get, but with a limited budget, they might able to do some great things. And that's probably one of the problems with a film adaptation of a video game: the filmmakers do too much and ruin everything.

Default_picture
January 29, 2011

Good article.

As for the many comments about Fillion... this all sounds like cult/fan praises of the guy for Firefly. Just sayin'.

Default_picture
January 29, 2011

I always thought David Boreanaz would be a good Nathan Drake. He's done plenty of action and some sarcastic humor on television. Of course, that's television and he probably can't carry a movie. I'm more bothered by Foxx in Kane & Lynch than Wahlberg in Uncharted. I don't really even like the Kane & Lynch games but I completed both of them and I don't see Foxx fitting that role well at all.

Default_picture
January 29, 2011

@Pierce: I've never seen Firefly. Regardless, it doesn't change the fact that he's a spitting image of the character, and the majority of Uncharted fans would agree.

Default_picture
January 30, 2011

I was dumbfounded how Kane and Lynch got a sequel, but now i'm completely flabbergasted how it some how struck up a movie deal.

I mean, really??

Demian_-_bitmobbio
January 31, 2011

wait a minute, this Jamie Foxx thing is for real??

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.