Separator
Condemned 2: Bloodshot Review.
Franksmall
Tuesday, October 27, 2009

The first Condemned came out alongside the launch of the Xbox 360. When I played it I found myself completely immersed in it's visceral blend of the survival horror and first person shooter genres. The inclusion of first person melee and lack of ammo for the guns made the game a bit slower than most, but this worked well because it added to the claustrophobia and sense of dread the game instilled.

I had been waiting for Condemned 2 since I finished that games rather vague ending, hoping for answers to the many questions that game presented. Now, I find myself waiting for Condemned 3 to get any real answers.

Condemned 2 is not a complete loss. The developers made many improvements that make it a vastly better game than the first one. The combat is deeper and quicker. Enemies are more varied and have better artificial intelligence. The graphics have a good, if not huge, upgrade.

Still, with all these improvements, many mistakes were made with concerns to the pacing of the game, and the way to story is portrayed.

 Condemned 2: Bloodshot

Condemned 2 drops you right into events, without any real set-up for players who may have missed the first game. Add to this mistake the fact that what is going on is so vaguely explained that players might just find themselves lost as to the motivation behind the main character. Because of this lack of clarity the game simply ends up being the events taking place. Any deeper meaning or sense of an overriding plot get lost and what remains is the equivalent of walking through a house of horrors.

 Condemned 2: Bloodshot

Things get much better midway through the game, but my fear is that many players will have given up on it long before things turn around. This is a shame, because anyone who does give up on Condemned 2 will be missing out on one of the scariest encounters ever in a video game. Nothing beats the combination of a rabid bear and a run down cabin.

The game is relatively short at only about ten hours, and the addition of online multiplayer will probably not extend the life of this game for most gamers. It feels rather tacked on and at this late date does not have many other players online to play with.

 Condemned 2: Bloodshot

Condemned 2 was a great rental for fans of the first game at launch, but the numerous problems contained in the game made the $60 price tag a little too steep. Now does seem like a much better time to try this game out. The price is hovering around $20 for a new copy, and you can pay even less if you don't have any quibbles about buying used games.

Condemned 2  might leave you wishing that the developers had spent some time making the game good from front to back, but you are at least guaranteed a few scares. I really hope the developers of this game can keep the improvements this game makes as far as gameplay, but add in a story that is worth caring about for the next game... If there is a next game.

Developer Monolith has proven that they can make dark, scary games that have cool gameplay innovations. What they have not proven is that they can make a clear and concise story to buoy all the hard work their artists, level designers and scripting programmers put into each game. Maybe if the company hired a few good writers their titles could step up to the next level. As they stand now Monolith is a good developer that has yet to make a truly AAA game.

While I enjoy both the Fear and Condemned series, it might just be time for Monolith to return to square one and start things fresh in a new series not bogged down by past failures.

 
0
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (3)
26583_1404714564368_1427496717_31101969_389938_n
October 26, 2009
Nice review, Frank. I also thought the expansion of the forensic investigations was a welcome addition.

And that bear was something else.
Lance_darnell
October 27, 2009
I thought that the sequel was decent? Is the original better, Frank? This game is actually affordable right now!!!
Franksmall
October 27, 2009
There are things I like more about the first game. Mainly story elements. Things are still a bit vague in the first game, but I went into the second game prepared for answers and got very few.

The First Person Melee in the first game is a bit weaker, but I think Monolith caving in and making guns more integral in the second game hurt the tension that was built by being forced to mainly use melee in the fist game.

I am a pretty huge fan of horror games, but even if you are not I would tell you to play the first Condemned. Both games in this series have some major flaws, but they also have moments of sheer amazement and terror.

They are interesting studies into immersion in first person experiences.

I would say that if you have not played these games, Breakdown, Mirror's Edge, Bioshock and Elder Scrolls: Oblivion or Fallout 3 then you really have not really experienced why first person games have been the leading style of game for this generation.
You must log in to post a comment. Please register or Connect with Facebook if you do not have an account yet.