All gamers are entitled to have a stupid opinion

Stoylogosmall
Monday, July 16, 2012
EDITOR'S NOTEfrom Sam Barsanti

There's an adage my dad used to say when I was a kid: "Opinions are like noses. Everybody has one and they all smell." I think we, as a society, would be better off if we kept that in mind more often. Just because you think someone has a dumb opinion doesn't mean they're wrong, because they probably think the same about you.

Dragon's Dogma

Since the American Revolution popularized the idea of freedom of speech, many American citizens have embraced that right to not only challenge their government and its leaders, but to also challenge the opinions and beliefs of others. Sadly, many countries do not share this common freedom that we have. 

However, with the advent of the Internet, that freedom can be expressed no matter where you hail from (for the most part). Now anyone from anywhere at any time can voice their opinions. Whether this is a good thing or a bad thing has yet to be determined, but there’s still a very important part of this that everyone must keep in mind:

Just because you have an opinion, doesn't mean it's the right one. 

 

I see people forgetting this more and more often in video game magazines and on video game websites. The Internet is a great staging area for anyone to voice their opinion about any game, whether they love it or hate it. I tend to feel bad for video game reviewers, because even though many people may agree with their opinions, there will always be a large group that will outright disagree no matter what. Sadly, the ones that agree do not voice their support as often as those who do not. 

What video game journalists must understand is that the right given to them to voice and spread their opinions in whatever fashion they choose is also shared by their readers, and while many of them may disagree with a review, their opinions must still be respected (as hard as that may be).

Too often I see video game magazine editors outright bash and humiliate their readers for disagreeing with their reviews, columns, opinion pieces, and so forth. It is not a good way to treat your readers (who, I might add, pay the subscription fees that pay your rent), nor is it a healthy way to defend your opinion or prove your credibility within the journalism field. If big-name magazines like Time, National Geographic, or The New Yorker saw how these opinions were being defended, they would look at us like children fighting on a playground. 

If the video game community wants to be respected, it's time for everyone, from all sides, to start acting like adults.

For one, if you're posting your opinions on any open forum for people to read, be prepared to defend your opinion and not just bash someone else’s. Remember that opinions, no matter how stupid, can never be truly wrong (that’s what makes them opinions). Many times your opinion will not be popular, and we all must understand that. 

Secondly, if you feed into the childishness of your attacker, you are no better than them. There is nothing wrong with acknowledging their feelings on your opinion and moving on in a mature manner. What will feverishly arguing whether Dragon's Dogma deserved a good score or not accomplish? Nothing.

Battlefield 3
Battlefield 3 received a lower Metacritic score than Modern Warfare 3, but many argued that it was the better game.

Thirdly, if you feel that a lot of people are attacking the way you present your opinions, then maybe you should change your approach. The magazine PLAY (rest in peace) did away with score-based reviews and instead favored more well-thought-out pieces. Very few games earned highly negative reviews, with the magazine choosing to focus on more particular write-ups that were geared toward a specific type of gamer (role-playing game reviews were written in a way that RPG gamers could relate to, and so on). Sometimes we have to look within ourselves and adjust and improve our own writing skills. No one said we were perfect. 

And lastly, to those readers and perusers of the Internet, please understand that one person's opinion does not warrant a childish bash against them if it clashes with your own. Sometimes opening up a dialogue with that person can shed some light on how they feel about something. 

Overall, we have to understand that the rights given to us to express and voice our opinions are the same rights given to those who want to attack them. We cannot be the type of people that will attack those that simply disagree with us, we have to try to see their opinion for what it is, and maybe learn and appreciate where it is they are coming from. Also, keep in mind that the self-proclaimed journalists and reviewers are not perfect in the way they present their opinions and could always stand to do a little self-improvement if called for. All in all, if we want to be a respected medium, we must learn to grow up and be mature. 

 
Problem? Report this post
BITMOB'S SPONSOR
Adsense-placeholder
Comments (15)
Default_picture
June 22, 2012

I actually enjoy a good debate and I love contrasting opinions. But personal attacks serve no constructive purpose. There's a big difference between rational criticism and the unfortunate alternative.

Stoylogosmall
June 22, 2012

I always welcome a good debate. So long as it's constructive and not destructive. 

Default_picture
June 22, 2012

I disagree. Also you suck ;)

Stoylogosmall
June 22, 2012

You're wrong good sir, absolutely wrong!

26583_1404714564368_1427496717_31101969_389938_n
June 24, 2012

I think you're all missing the bigger point, which is that the Wii U is going to win.

Default_picture
June 25, 2012

What are you talking about? Halo 4 is surely going to suck!

Stoylogosmall
June 25, 2012

I think you guys are missing the point of my article. 

Microsoft's new system is going to have a Blu-Ray Player, and Kinect Star Wars is Game of the Year! 

Avi2
July 16, 2012

"If the video game community wants to be respected, it's time for everyone, from all sides, to start acting like adults."

 

I've seen that come up in so many articles in the current rash of political correct articles, schooling us about gender, violence, thoughts, 1984..err, things. Frankly, I've had it with that claim. I'm an adult and I act as such; I think I hold the right to act like a snooty brat if that's the way I see fit. I just so happen to accomodate a style that comes off as ridiculous, because I believe it invokes a certain psychological element from people. I don't particularly think things that ARE considered "adult enough" by the given norm to be all that insightful either, but I wouldn't make assumptions based on it. To each their own, that's what the article is about, yes?

Though I do concur that destroying someone else's views is not the same as bringing arguments to the table yourself in a form of defending your point of view. Discussion is however always good. Dragon's Dogma was a wasted opportunity

Good article. Perpetual improvement is important, though I believe most of us already are on the base of a mature level.

Sincerely, 
I'm an adult

 

P.S.: My dad's not a phone.

Stoylogosmall
July 16, 2012

Mostly my point in the article is that I feel that conflicting viewpoints and opinions on games should be discussed in a better way than, "That game sucks, and you suck for thinking it's good!"  

I just hope that one day people don't treat their own opinions like gospel, and are open to calming debate, especially when it comes to someone trying to challenge that opinion. 

Avi2
July 16, 2012

But then that quip is irrelevant, is it not? Isn't that a form of name calling? Implying that others might not be on the satisfactory level?

I could tie it to this line: "Secondly, if you feed into the childishness of your attacker, you are no better than them." By saying people need to starting "acting right," you imply they aren't yet. I feel it'd be better without that statement, merely pushing for improvement rather than judgement.

Stoylogosmall
July 16, 2012

There is not one way to conduct an argument/disagreement/discussion, and I never said that people need to "act right", even though the article may lead people to such a conclusion. To say "act right" is more name calling than anything. 

Regardless, there are a lot of people that feverishly attack others' thoughts and opinions, and those kind of attacks serve no purpose in trying to make someone at the very least understand your opinion. 

I do like what you say with "pushing for improvement", that tied into my paragraph "if you feel that a lot of people are attacking the way you present your opinions, then maybe you should change your approach."

Avi2
July 16, 2012

You literally said "start acting like adults," I just rephrased it for continuity.

 

And I was more specifically talking about your conclusive paragraph, but that works too. Not a method I'm fond of myself (you'll find people are reluctant to open up, after any initial failure to argue), but regardless a worthy effort if you should choose to do so. Nothing wrong with keeping a dialogue going, as long as it is in fact a dialogue and not a one-way argument.

Default_picture
July 17, 2012

Notice how you two are having a civil debate through these comments, and not mudslinging or insulting each other's moms. I think that's pretty much all Stojan is looking for here. Good article.

Default_picture
July 17, 2012

no one said we had to be politically correct but it is funny how the argument went that way

Default_picture
July 18, 2012

I found it as a form of amusement back in the day with magazines, such as GameNOW (EGM2/Expert Gamer).

They would "bust the readers' balls," so to speak.

However, it was more in lines of sarcasm or entertainment; and it didn't reference someone's opinion on a review.

It's what made me keep reading (and writing to them) that made it fun.

I understand today’s conception (with the Internet); several people have an enormous ego that gets the best of them simply because one doesn’t agree with their thoughts.

Debate or controversy creates buzz, either way.

You must log in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.